"Pay to Play" Pitch Opportunities

You’ve been approached by someone to participate in a pitch. Yet it will cost you money to participate. Is this fair?

This has been a sensitive issue for many in the business. It touches on search consultants who accept money from both sides of the agency/client relationship. It also touches on consultants or business models who don’t accept money from clients. Their models rely on agency compensation – they’re not paid by marketers.

You may feel differently, but to me,  a “pay to play” scenario can work. But it can get messy.

Is a little transparency too much to ask? Having thought about this a bunch, maybe that’s the key. Does the marketer know what’s going on? Do the agencies? And are all parties comfortable with the arrangement? If they are, have at it. Who are we as transaction outsiders to cry foul?

Another key is the level of support being provided by the middle-man / connector. It starts getting mushy when the services being provided move beyond providing a simple list of qualified, interested agencies.

Here’s a related thought that will be far from the final one around this issue: we consultants should heal ourselves! We just shouldn’t take money from clients if we also take money from agencies. It’s too easy to see how this kind of situation would influence the service and outcome of a given pitch. Very slippery slope.

Find out more about this in another post: http://thunderclapcg.com/new-business-vs-search-consultants/.

Comments

  1. Steve Congdon says:

    Welcome, newcomers! There is a ton of other search consultant related posts on this site. Feel free to use the search button in the upper right hand corner of this blog.

    Or the search consultant category (on your left.)

Trackbacks

  1. […] you thinking. Or at least helps get you up to speed on this issue. You can find more here, here and here. (Short version: I’m an agency-only consultant, and find the double dippers to be a bad lot. […]